InsightGuard
Request a demo
Request a demo

Product note: finding ownership and closure rationale

Product 05 May 2026 1 min read

Contents

Share

A finding without an owner never closes; without a closure rationale it reopens three months later. We made both mandatory fields.

Finding lists grow for two reasons: unowned records and closures without a rationale. Both are process problems, supported by the product.

Ownership

Every finding is assigned to a person or team. A finding does not move to "open" before assignment, so no queue forms that nobody watches.

Closure rationale

Closure is tied to one of three reasons:

  • Remediated — the asset was removed or the exposure fixed; a verification record is attached.
  • Accepted — the risk was knowingly accepted; who accepted it and the review date are recorded.
  • Not applicable — the finding is not ours, with a stated reason.

Reopening

When the same finding is detected again it is shown with its previous closure rationale. If a record closed as "not applicable" returns, the rationale itself goes to review.

InsightGuard CTI Ekibi

Threat Intelligence Team

The InsightGuard research team, responsible for collection infrastructure, actor tracking and report production.

Related posts

Product 21.08.2026 1 min

Three correct ways to close a case

Resolved, false positive and risk accepted are not the same thing. Getting the distinction right determines what your report says …